Comments on: Theory 2 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/ A Ferrari and Chelsea fan, who seldom writes about them Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:40:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: rubic_cube http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7041 rubic_cube Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:13:27 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7041 Ferro - I think I agree with you, provided one more assumption is made. The assumption is that X is J about her friends and X is somewhat possessive about her friends which obviously must include you. X will not like to share her friends and therefore the inverse proportion holds true. psst! I have seen this happen with a colleague and his friendi! ;-) And Priya's statement should be a precondition to your theory. If her statement holds true, then your theory may work. Ferro - I think I agree with you, provided one more assumption is made. The assumption is that X is J about her friends and X is somewhat possessive about her friends which obviously must include you. X will not like to share her friends and therefore the inverse proportion holds true. psst! I have seen this happen with a colleague and his friendi! ;-) And Priya’s statement should be a precondition to your theory. If her statement holds true, then your theory may work.

]]> By: F e r r a r i http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7020 F e r r a r i Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:58:04 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7020 shek and balaji, Guess you guys are lucky :) sk, Archives la irukkum paarunga :) Jacky, Naan indha viLayattukku varalai :P priya, Ahem ;-) shek and balaji,
Guess you guys are lucky :)

sk,
Archives la irukkum paarunga :)

Jacky,
Naan indha viLayattukku varalai :P

priya,
Ahem ;-)

]]> By: priya http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7018 priya Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:18:00 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7018 Well.. it is also inversely proportional to how much u impress X :-p Well.. it is also inversely proportional to how much u impress X :-p

]]> By: Jacky http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7017 Jacky Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:15:18 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7017 If that guy is a Manmada .......! Okay you called her X, and say if her friend is XX, I'd like to know the probability of meeting XX's friend? :) If that guy is a Manmada …….! Okay you called her X, and say if her friend is XX, I’d like to know the probability of meeting XX’s friend?
:)

]]> By: B a l a j i http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7016 B a l a j i Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:43:02 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7016 agree with Shek...most of the times it is directly proportional. but once u get closer to X, then the chances of u speaking with X's friend is inversely proportional to how cute X is. agree with Shek…most of the times it is directly proportional.

but once u get closer to X, then the chances of u speaking with X’s friend is inversely proportional to how cute X is.

]]> By: sk http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7014 sk Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:41:13 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7014 Hehehe! :) Where is theory 1? Hehehe! :)

Where is theory 1?

]]> By: shek http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7013 shek Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:14:53 +0000 http://prabhukrish.net/2006/02/26/theory-2/#comment-7013 enakku directly proportional-aa irundhirukku! enakku directly proportional-aa irundhirukku!

]]>